In the modern world, science and technology have taken full effect of events bringing a recognizable gap between scholar and theologians in matters concerning the faith. There have been attempts to harmonize the differences, but eventually, conservatives remain adamant to compromise on certain issue thereby widening the rift. Below are some valuable perspectives of Tempe liberal church.
Of the most argued principle is the authority of scripture interpretation. The conservatives maintain that there should be an authority house to offer an interpretation, not everyone or third parties. The modern liberals allow the contributions of science in explanation of various aspects of nature and mystical human experiences. They advocate for a reformist approach encompassing knowledge of the present.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also in their declaration that Christianity should be reliable and relevant touching the life of modern setup. It is a claim to allow modern intellect to contribute to the explanation of various mysteries where they are enough evidence to support a given claim. They allow social science and science of nature to give judgments on various issues and allow individual reasoning experience in support of ethical living.
Another stand is the basis of truth in accordance with changing of symbols and forms used to connote truth by modern scholars and religion teachers. They advocate for new views of the truth and not entirely on known signs and analogies from the religion predecessors in past centuries. They discourage treatment of symbols and forms as the absolute truth rather than the truth itself.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
Another notable thing is the issue of bible story accuracies and presentation of facts. They argue that the main thing is the teaching not how historically the stories may be aligned and facts presented. The emphasis is on what is taught in the gospels about Christ but not what format they are presented in or rather chronology in various books of the gospel.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
Of the most argued principle is the authority of scripture interpretation. The conservatives maintain that there should be an authority house to offer an interpretation, not everyone or third parties. The modern liberals allow the contributions of science in explanation of various aspects of nature and mystical human experiences. They advocate for a reformist approach encompassing knowledge of the present.
They also have another task of revolving the world into a better place for everyone. This could be seen as a contrary view of the coming of a new fair world ruled by the Christ as sited in scriptures. They explain that they believe in the coming of such an authority but also wants people and more so Christians to create a good place for everyone rather than stay without doing anything.
It is also in their declaration that Christianity should be reliable and relevant touching the life of modern setup. It is a claim to allow modern intellect to contribute to the explanation of various mysteries where they are enough evidence to support a given claim. They allow social science and science of nature to give judgments on various issues and allow individual reasoning experience in support of ethical living.
Another stand is the basis of truth in accordance with changing of symbols and forms used to connote truth by modern scholars and religion teachers. They advocate for new views of the truth and not entirely on known signs and analogies from the religion predecessors in past centuries. They discourage treatment of symbols and forms as the absolute truth rather than the truth itself.
It is also their explanation that the current differences on various issues on fundamental faith beliefs could be a product of interpretation and language barriers. They believe there is one fundamental thing that is faith or belief, but the presentation is marred with ambiguities that yield grounds for disagreements. The main concern is the central belief but also believe that language is the main course of disagreements.
Another notable thing is the issue of bible story accuracies and presentation of facts. They argue that the main thing is the teaching not how historically the stories may be aligned and facts presented. The emphasis is on what is taught in the gospels about Christ but not what format they are presented in or rather chronology in various books of the gospel.
According to them, true religion is based on the way of Christ not all existing doctrine about the Messiah. They argue that this religion is a faith, not a doctrine of Christ where its main focus is learning about Christ. Their belief is the Christ himself and his main goal of saving mankind.
About the Author:
Tempe liberal church invites you to pay a quick visit to its official website. Here is the web page you need at http://www.desertpalmucc.org.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий